The Origin of the Name “California” and the Island Myth

Nicholas de Fer's map of 1705 showing California as an island. It is titled "Cette Carte De Californie et Du Nouveau Mexique." Image provided courtesy http://www.RareMaps.com — Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc.

The Origin of the Name “California”

“There ruled on that island of California, a queen great of body, very beautiful for her race, at a flourishing age, desirous in her thoughts of achieving great things, valiant in strength, cunning in her brave heart, more than any other who had ruled that kingdom before her. . .Queen Calafia.”

—Garcia Ordonez de Montalvo, “The Adventures of Esplandián” (1510)

The name “California” derives from a novel written by Garcia Ordonez de Montalvo in the 16th century titled, “Las Sergas del muy esforzado caballero Esplandian, hijo del excelente rey Amandis de Gaula.” It was the fifth book in a series of Spanish romance novels.

The story tells of a mythical island called “California” ruled by Queen Calafia and warrior women “of vigorous bodies and strong and ardent hearts and of great strength.” The queen and her warriors venture forth on forays, where they seize and kill men they come upon. Any man found in their domain they eat. And although sometimes they have children from those they make peace with they keep only daughters and murder sons. It is a land near the Terrestrial Paradise, where the only metal in existence is gold. A land where griffons abound, which the women take as pets and feed to them the men they capture and the sons they bear.

Where Montalvo got the idea for the name remains unknown, but several plausible theories exist. One idea holds that it stems from an Islamic term for leader, which is “caliph.” The Spanish equivalent being “Calif.” In Montalvo’s novel Queen Calafia is a sovereign ruler who is allied with infidels against Muslims. Thus the name “California” is a logical designation for the land she ruled over.

Montalvo’s novels were popular reading material and the legend of California island was not unknown to New World explorers of the time. But like much in history no definitive understanding informs us today of the events surrounding the actual naming of the land that is now part of the United States. “No clear account has come down to us,” Dora Beale Polk writes, “about how the name was chosen, where, when, or by whom. All we have to date are tantalizing scraps of information.” What is understood is that the name was first applied in some manner to the Baja peninsula. Either the headland known today as Land’s End near where Cabo San Lucas is located or in reference to the entire peninsula itself.

The Island of California Myth

“A general tendency of geography and romance prevailing in those days was to locate in an insular landscape the scene of adventures and the place of wonders and marvels.”

Leonardo Olschki Storia letteraria delle scoperte geografiche (1937)

Spanish explorers of the 16th century thought California was an island. It was a myth that ebbed and flowed through the centuries based on the reports of various maritime explorers of different nationalities. Despite occasional doubt cast upon the legend and contrary evidence, the mistake was reflected on maps for a couple hundred years and became one of the great cartographic errors of all-time.

Upon landing on the Baja California peninsula in 1535, Hernán Cortés believed he had found an island. In describing his discovery as insular he is credited as the originator of the island theory. Cortés thought the body of water later named in his honor, the Sea of Cortés, was actually a strait separating mainland Mexico from the island of California. In 1539, he sent an expedition led by Francisco de Ulloa to circumnavigate the imagined island and it was Ulloa that named the Gulf of California in Cortés’ honor. Ulloa, however, was unable to lay the myth to rest and correct Cortes’ erroneous belief. The legend lived on.

Yet, as early as 1542, the notion of California being an island was largely dismissed and cartographers began showing the region attached to the mainland. Despite the change in general sentiment, though, all views remained at most “ambiguous or fence-straddling theories,” Polk writes. The myth proved hard to kill.

Maps drawn in subsequent years, such as the one featured here from 1705, resurrected the island myth. It was not until 1747 that the true nature of California was finally settled. In that year, Spanish monarch Ferdinand VI issued a royal proclamation based on the exploration of the Jesuit missionary, Fernando Consag, and informed the world that “California is not an island.” There was finally too much evidence for myth and fantasy to outweigh empirical facts on the balance of reason. At long last the uncertainty was over.

A detail showing the “Canal of Santa Barbara” as thought to exist in 1705. It was a place name later mentioned by Richard Henry Dana, Jr. in 1835. Today it is better known as the Santa Barbara Channel.

Bibliography:

Dora Beale Polk, The Island of California: A History of the Myth (1991)

Advertisements
This entry was posted in California and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to The Origin of the Name “California” and the Island Myth

  1. craig says:

    Great piece, Jack. And that old French map is icing on the cake — love it.

    Didn’t Hall & Oates do a song about Queen Calafia? 😉

  2. Jack, Milton Hammer used to own a rare book store in El Paseo and had a copy of a 17th Century Spanish map that showed California as an island. I’ve never seen another copy despite looking for three decades. This French map is the only other one I’ve seen.

    • Jack Elliott says:

      That would be some piece of historical treasure to own!

      • Iris says:

        Jack, Why is it so difficult to say that California was named after a black (woman) Queen? California was an island where only Black women lived and Cortez a Mexican man was so mesmerrized with this mystical Black woman that he named California after the Black Queens name “Califia.”

      • Jack Elliott says:

        Despite your conjecture about Cortes’ supposed thoughts about an apocryphal black queen from a romance novel, there is no proof Cortes named California after a black woman, as my original post makes clear.

        And, more to the point, race does not appear to play any role whatsoever in this matter, hence the lack of mention.

  3. Randy Patel says:

    Actually the word California is composed of two words derived from Spanish and Italian which were heavy influences at the time. (Cortes and Columbus) Cali short for hot in Spanish; Fornia means Oven in Italian. California means: Hot Ovens

    • Jack Elliott says:

      That’s one possibility, though oddly out of place considering what we know of Columbus.

      Nobody knows for sure.

    • Candace says:

      I find it extremely interesting that of all of the descriptive characteristics the author used you decided that race did not play a part and left out that the women where black. You mentioned everything else. Now ask yourself why is that the one thing that was not important. This is how history and everything else is whitewashed. Knowing that a such a “discovery” was named for a fictional place inhabited by blacks opens an uncomfortable dialogue about the aboriginal inhabitants of California and America as a whole. There is one glaringly obvious detail that might make an explorer think think of the place in the book when landing in California and you decided to leave it out.

  4. Anonymous says:

    Is there actual proof that the inhabitants were black, or is that just a rumor someone made up? I can believe the Spanish found a land which they thought was beautiful and named it after a place in a fictional novel. It happens all the time history. I know a native tribe in California not far from where I grew up, and they aren’t black. So can we clear this up?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s